Periodic table

Corrosion engineering consultant

Corrosion Doctors site map

Alphabetical index of the Corrosion Doctors Web site

Comparison of Pipeline Coatings

Systems used in recent history

Asphalt / Coal tar: 1940 to 1970

Advantages

Disadvantages

Easy to apply

Subject to oxidation and cracking

Minimal surface preparation required

Soil stress has been an issue

Long track record in certain environments without failure

Limitations at low application temperatures

Permeable to cathodic protection in event of failure

Environmental and exposure concerns

Associated with corrosion and stress crack corrosion failures

Tape wrap (two layer): 1960 to now

Advantages

Disadvantages

Simple application

Poor shear stress resistance

Many documented failures related to corrosion and stress crack corrosion

Shielding of cathodic protection

Adhesives subject to biodegradation

Two-layer extruded polyethylene: 1960 to now

Advantages

Disadvantages

Excellent track record

Limited temperature range

Good handling

Poor shear stress resistance

Limited pipe sizes (<24 in. [610 mm] outside diameter)

Fusion-bonded epoxy: 1975 to now

Advantages

Disadvantages

Excellent adhesion and corrosion resistance

Low impact resistance

Does not shield cathodic protection

High moisture absorption and permeation

Three-layer polyotefin: 1986 to now

Advantages

Disadvantages

Excellent combination of properties

Best suited for electrical resistance welded pipes

High thickness to eliminate weld tenting

Composite coating: 1990 to now

Advantages

Disadvantages

Excellent combination of properties

Suitable only for large diameter pipes and is not designed for small diameter pipes (<406 mm OD)

Conforms well to external raised weld profiles

(reference)